Open Access for REF
The next REF exercise will largely build on the 2021 REF, which evidenced a high degree of open access compliance across UK institutions. There will be an open access mandate for journal articles and conference proceedings just as there was for the 2021 cycle, however, no additional requirement has been stipulated for long form outputs such as monographs or book chapters. Outputs in scope are those published between 01 January 2021 and 31 December 2028, though some of the updated requirements will only be mandatory from 01 January 2026.
REF2029 requirements & information
- The basics
- How is Open Access defined in this policy?
- What outputs does this cover?
- How can an output comply?
- What are the permitted embargo periods?
- Do I need to deposit in a repository if the article was published as Gold OA
- Is there any specific licence requirement?
- What if the output doesn't comply?
- Exceptions for the REF 2029 Open Access policy
Deposit exceptions
The following exceptions deal with cases where the output is unable to meet the deposit requirements, or has been made open access via another route.
- 1. Individual was unable to secure the use of a repository
- 2. Individual experienced a delay securing the accepted manuscript (eg for multi-authored papers)
- 3. Individual was not employed by a UK HEI at the point of acceptance
- 4. It would be unlawful to deposit, or request the deposit of, the output
- 5. Depositing the output would present a security risk
- 6. The output was published as Gold open access
Access exceptions
The following exceptions deal with cases where deposit of the output is possible but there are issues with meeting the access requirements. The accepted manuscript should still be deposited as soon as possible.
- 7. Output depends on third party content for which open access rights could not be granted
- 8. The output requires an embargo period that exceeds the stated maxima, and was the most appropriate publication for the output
- 9. The publisher actively disallows open access deposit in a repository and was the most appropriate publication for the output
Technical exceptions
The following exceptions deal with cases where an output is unable to meet the criteria due to a technical issue.
- 10. At acceptance, the individual was at a different UK HEI that failed to comply
- 11. A short-term technical failure within the repository prevented compliance
- 12. An external service provider failure prevented compliance (eg a subject repository ceased to operate)
Other exceptions
In very exceptional cases, it may not be possible for an output to meet the open access requirements for a reason not covered by the exceptions listed above and it may be appropriate to record an ‘Other’ exception giving an explanation of why the requirements could not be met. Other exceptions will be handled on a case-by-case basis and authors should contact RQI to discuss. Please raise the issue as soon as possible after it arises.
Additional REF 2029 exception for submission
For REF 2029, outputs authored by one or more non-volume contributing staff may be submitted as part of a unit’s REF submission who are or were ineligible to be included in the volume measure for REF 2029.
Further information
Read the document and the or their
Contact the Library Research Support team for support with Open Access questions at openaccess@sussex.ac.uk
Get in touch with the Research Quality and Impact team at rqi@sussex.ac.uk
Get in touch with the Library Sussex Research Online team at sro@sussex.ac.uk